"48.9% of organizations are entirely blind to AI agent behavior" — Salt Security, April 2026
Enterprise compliance and regulatory frameworks are converging on a single question about AI systems: was this action evaluated against policy before it executed, and can you prove it? ORILink answers that question by design — not as a reporting add-on, but as a direct output of the enforcement architecture.
Every action that passes through Gate 2 — whether cleared or blocked — generates a signed enforcement record containing:
These records are stored in ORIMark, your self-hosted audit registry. Talonyx never receives or stores your enforcement data.
"Walk me through the authorization chain."
Here is the signed record showing Gate 2 evaluated this action against policy v1.2 at [timestamp], cleared it at [layer], and only then did it execute. The record cannot be retroactively altered — it is generated at enforcement time, not reconstructed from logs after the fact.
Here are the logs showing what happened. There is no record that the action was evaluated against policy before it fired.
The following frameworks ask questions that ORILink enforcement records directly address:
Note: ORILink is not certified under these frameworks. This page describes what ORILink produces and how it maps to common audit requirements. Consult your compliance team for certification guidance.
ORIMark, the audit registry, runs entirely on your infrastructure. Your enforcement records never leave your environment. This matters for regulated industries where data residency and custody are audit requirements in their own right.